The Casacionista questioned the fact that its conduct had not been analysed in accordance with the content of the general law of the national cash system in force at the material time. However, it follows from the merits of the judgment that her substantive arguments relating to the assessment of the functions which she actually exercised within the injured municipal unit were acquitted and that it is not possible, in cassation, to carry out an autonomous assessment of the evidence. What is denounced in its purity is the guilty trial before the Court of the merits, which escapes the control of the cassation.